NATUNA UK (KAKAP 2) LIMITED

Figures converted to GBP from USD at 0.748 per USD (Frankfurter spot rate) — hover any figure for the original. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. About these numbers

• Turnover

  -2.2%

  £2,079,689 → £2,034,836

• Cash

  -75.7%

  £1,315,691 → £319,205

• Net assets

  +12.5%

  £740,076 → £832,773

• Employees

  —

  Not reported

• Operating profit

  -66.7%

  £325,933 → £108,395

• Profit before tax

  +214.9%

  £35,135 → £110,638

Each % is (latest − prior) ÷ |prior| for the line item as filed. The comparison is only shown when the latest and prior accounts cover broadly equal-length periods — short or long stubs (typical around incorporation or a year-end change) are suppressed rather than misrepresented. Lines a company doesn't report are omitted. About these numbers

Margins divide P&L lines by turnover. Gearing is liabilities over total assets. Current ratio is current assets over creditors falling due within one year. Interest cover is operating profit over absolute finance costs. Sector-distribution context coming next.

1. NATUNA UK (KAKAP 2) LIMITED 2009-06-15 → present
2. SANTOS UK (KAKAP 2) LIMITED 2005-08-09 → 2009-06-15
3. NOVUS UK (KAKAP 2) LIMITED 1996-05-20 → 2005-08-09
4. MARATHON PETROLEUM U.K. KAKAP LIMITED 1996-03-21 → 1996-05-20
5. MARATHON OIL PETROLEUM U.K. KAKAP LIMITED 1996-03-07 → 1996-03-21
6. PRECIS (1400) LIMITED 1995-10-18 → 1996-03-07

Accounting basis

IFRS

Reporting scope

Standalone (parent only)

Auditor

Crowe U.K. LLP

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Affirmed

“After reviewing the Company's budget and plans, and the letter of support provided by the ultimate parent company Pleco Energy Limited, the Directors consider that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least 17 months from the date of approval of the financial statements. To support the operations, the Directors believe the Company will be able to generate operating cash flows sufficient enough to cover the Company's operating expenses and to meet its obligations as they fall due. Therefore, the Directors consider it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial statements.”

Significant events

• “In June 2025, Tax Court accepted the Company appeal letters for 2021 BPT Tax Dispute and in August 2025, the Company received the tax refund in the amount US$86,000. In October 2025, Fiscus filed a judicial review application to the Supreme Court.”
• “In August 2025, the Tax Court rejected the Company appealed letter for 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 BPT Tax Dispute in the amount US$371,000. In August 2025, the Company filed a judicial review to the Supreme Court.”
• “On 28 December 2025, the Company filed a judicial review to the Supreme Court on Tax Court rejection.”
• “On 9 October 2025, Fiscus filed a judicial review to the Supreme Court on Tax Court accepted the Company appeal.”
• “On 3 December 2025, the Company received the tax assessment letters for underpaid 2022 &2023 BPT amounting to US$153,000 and also including Transfer on Participating Interest Tax from Star Energy Oil & Gas Pte Ltd to Pleco Energy Ltd in the amount IDR 1,650,000,000 (in US$ 103,000). The Company has made the payment on 20 January 2026 and currently the Company preparing the objection letters to be sent to the Tax Office.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

6

last 12 months

Capital events

0

last 24 months

Officers appointed

1

last 12 months

Officers resigned

1

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.