WALKERSTEEL LIMITED

Values shown as filed in the company's annual accounts. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. About these numbers

• Turnover

  -14.1%

  £18,539,895 → £15,925,949

• Cash

  +27.5%

  £24,423 → £31,151

• Net assets

  +0.6%

  £2,971,516 → £2,988,464

• Employees

  0%

  24 → 24

• Operating profit

  +0.9%

  £200,437 → £202,231

• Profit before tax

  +151.4%

  £6,742 → £16,948

• Wages

  -9.4%

  £673,461 → £610,159

Each % is (latest − prior) ÷ |prior| for the line item as filed. The comparison is only shown when the latest and prior accounts cover broadly equal-length periods — short or long stubs (typical around incorporation or a year-end change) are suppressed rather than misrepresented. Lines a company doesn't report are omitted. About these numbers

Margins divide P&L lines by turnover. Gearing is liabilities over total assets. Current ratio is current assets over creditors falling due within one year. Interest cover is operating profit over absolute finance costs. Sector-distribution context coming next.

1. WALKERSTEEL LIMITED 2003-05-28 → present
2. WALKER-CSM STEELSTOCK LIMITED 2001-01-23 → 2003-05-28
3. CSM STEEL STOCKHOLDERS LIMITED 2000-04-25 → 2001-01-23
4. OMEGA STAINLESS LIMITED 1999-04-23 → 2000-04-25
5. SORTEN LIMITED 1999-01-28 → 1999-04-23

Accounting basis

FRS 102

Reporting scope

Standalone (parent only)

Auditor

Howard & Co

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Affirmed

“In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the director's use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the original financial statements were authorised for issue.”

Significant events

• “The company has encountered a challenging year and the Directors consider that the results for the year do not reflect the underlying potential of the business and that the reported loss was driven primarily by: Margin pressure arising from volatile steel prices and competitive market conditions. Elevated operating and logistics costs. Inefficiencies associated with inventory holding and stock turnover. While demand across core customer sectors has remained resilient, the company has experienced margin volatility due to rapid movements in steel prices and the timing mismatch between stock replacement costs and customer pricing.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

2

last 12 months

Capital events

0

last 24 months

Officers appointed

0

last 12 months

Officers resigned

0

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.